Deciphering cytopenias in internal medicine: a single-center observational study.

Cytopenia is a common finding in patients admitted to internal medicine wards and the clinical workup may be long and time-consuming. In this single-center observational study, we analyzed a series of 151 inpatients who received hematologist referral due to cytopenia observed during hospital admission. Patients were mainly elderly (median 71 years, 15-96) and 87% had at least one comorbidity. Anemia was the most common cytopenia (91%), followed by thrombocytopenia (51%), and neutropenia (22%); 73 (48%) patients had a bicytopenia and 5 (3%) pancytopenia. Cytopenias were mainly severe, 66% of cases required RBC transfusions, and 21% platelet pools. During a median hospital stay of 15 days (1-166), 53 subjects (35%) received a hematologic discharge diagnosis, whilst the two-thirds had secondary cytopenia mainly due to associated comorbidities. Only about 34% of 2,728 diagnostic tests performed (including laboratory, imaging, and histology) clearly informed the discharge diagnosis in this heterogenous setting. Specifically, bone-marrow evaluation indicated in 46 (30%) patients, was diagnostic in 32 (69.6%). Eleven percent of patients died due to progression of the oncohematologic disease (29%), sepsis (24%), and solid tumor progression (24%). In conclusion, cytopenias in the internal medicine setting are mainly severe, more frequently secondary to associated comorbidities (2/3 of patients) and deserve proper workup before second/third-level tests (immune-hematological assays and CT scan or PET and bone-marrow evaluation, respectively).

[Easing the patients' trajectories from private practice to hospital: One-year experiment of the RAPIDO project]. / Fluidification du parcours ville-hôpital : analyse de la trajectoire des patients impliqués dans le dispositif RAPIDO après un an de mise en place.

INTRODUCTION: Internal medicine departments manage patients referred by emergency departments or private practitioners. Considering the overcrowding of emergency departments and lack of beds for inpatients, this specialty must be part of an "ambulatory shift", particularly by strengthening the links between community and hospital medicine. Our objective was to evaluate a new care pathway in internal medicine at Nîmes university hospital. METHODS: Our department has developed the RAPIDO project (Réseau d'Aide à la PrIse en Charge Diagnostique et d'Orientation). The referring general practitioner contacts a senior internist on a dedicated phone line. After careful evaluation, he may offer a consultation within 15 days. A summary report is then given to the patient. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and November 2021, 254 patients were seen via RAPIDO. The average call-consultation time period was 6.4 (±4.5) days, for symptoms lasting for 2 weeks to 3 months in 43% (n=109) of cases. The reason for the call was a suspicion of systemic disease in 28% of cases (n=84), or a dysfunction of an organ in 16%. A diagnosis was made in 89% of cases. The budget of the whole procedure was balanced. CONCLUSION: A quick internal medicine consultation pathway for general practitioners seems to be a relevant, feasible and economically viable healthcare trajectory, which can be transposed to any type of healthcare institution, as soon as sufficient human resources are dedicated.

Advancing Internal Medicine Training: Experience of a Bedside Procedure Service as a Resident Elective.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the American Board of Internal Medicine eliminated numeric procedure requirements for licensing. The level of exposure to procedures during residency, and subsequent competence of graduating residents, is variable. In 2015, our institution developed a bedside procedure service (BPS) with the intent to teach ultrasound guidance and procedural training to internal medicine residents with direct supervision of technique by Hospital Medicine faculty to optimize learning, increase confidence, and improve patient safety. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we review the number and complication rates of resident procedures on a dedicated internal medicine bedside procedure service (BPS) as a resident elective. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we reviewed internally collected data from BPS procedures performed from 2015-2019. The BPS offers a variety of procedures done with ultrasound guidance at an adult tertiary care referral center. BPS services are available to all inpatient hospital services. A rotation with the BPS was offered as a stand-alone resident elective for the first time in 2015. RESULTS: 69 residents performed a total of 2700 ultrasound-guided/assisted procedures and 146 diagnostic ultrasound scans from 2015-2019. Residents performed an average of 40 procedures during their elective month. There were 5 resident performed procedural complications with an overall complication rate of 0.19%. CONCLUSIONS: Our BPS increased procedural opportunities for residents and allowed for real-time feedback by an experienced faculty member in a one-on-one setting. A dedicated rotation allows the time to focus on becoming proficient in invasive procedures with expert supervision.

Awareness of sex and gender dimensions among physicians: the European federation of internal medicine assessment of gender differences in Europe (EFIM-IMAGINE) survey.

Sociocultural gender is a complex construct encompassing different aspects of individuals' life, whereas sex refers to biological factors. These terms are often misused, although they impact differently on individuals' health. Recognizing the role of sex and gender on health status is fundamental in the pursuit of a personalized medicine. Aim of the current study was to investigate the awareness in approaching clinical and research questions on the impact of sex and gender on health among European internists. Clinicians affiliated with the European Federation of Internal Medicine from 33 countries participated to the study on a voluntary basis between January 1st, 2018 and July 31st, 2019. Internists' awareness and knowledge on sex and gender issues in clinical medicine were measured by an online anonymized 7-item survey. A total of 1323 European internists responded to the survey of which 57% were women, mostly young or middle-aged (78%), and practicing in public general medicine services (74.5%). The majority (79%) recognized that sex and gender are not interchangeable terms, though a wide discrepancy exists on what clinicians think sex and gender concepts incorporate. Biological sex and sociocultural gender were recognized as determinants of health mainly in cardiovascular and autoimmune/rheumatic diseases. Up to 80% of respondents acknowledged the low participation of female individuals in trials and more than 60% the lack of sex-specific clinical guidelines. Internists also express the willingness of getting more knowledge on the impact of sex and gender in cerebrovascular/cognitive and inflammatory bowel diseases. Biological sex and sociocultural gender are factors influencing health and disease. Although awareness and knowledge remain suboptimal across European internists, most acknowledge the underrepresentation of female subjects in trials, the lack of sex-specific guidelines and the need of being more informed on sex and gender-based differences in diseases.

Predictors of in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients and the role of telemetry in an internal medicine ward during the third phase of the pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The first pandemic phase of COVID-19 in Italy was characterized by high in-hospital mortality ranging from 23% to 38%. During the third pandemic phase there has been an improvement in the management and treatment of COVID-19, so mortality and predictors may have changed. A prospective study was planned to identify predictors of mortality during the third pandemic phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 15 December 2020 to 15 May 2021, 208 patients were hospitalized (median age: 64 years; males: 58.6%); 83% had a median of 2 (IQR,1-4) comorbidities; pneumonia was present in 89.8%. Patients were monitored remotely for respiratory function and ECG trace for 24 hours/day. Management and treatment were done following the timing and dosage recommended by international guidelines. RESULTS: 79.2% of patients necessitated O2-therapy. ARDS was present in 46.1% of patients and 45.4% received non-invasive ventilation and 11.1% required ICU treatment. 38% developed arrhythmias which were identified early by telemetry and promptly treated. The in-hospital mortality rate was 10%. At multivariate analysis independent predictors of mortality were: older age (R-R for≥70 years: 5.44), number of comorbidities ≥3 (R-R 2.72), eGFR ≤60 ml/min (RR 2.91), high d-Dimer (R-R for≥1,000 ng/ml:7.53), and low PaO2/FiO2 (R-R for <200: 3.21). CONCLUSIONS: Management and treatment adherence to recommendations, use of telemetry, and no overcrowding appear to reduce mortality. Advanced age, number of comorbidities, severe renal failure, high d-Dimer and low P/F remain predictors of poor outcome. The data help to identify current high-risk COVID-19 patients in whom management has yet to be optimized, who require the greatest therapeutic effort, and subjects in whom vaccination is mandatory.

Rapid Development and Deployment of an Intensivist-Led Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Program.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a rapidly deployed intensivist-led venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation program in a preexisting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. DESIGN: A retrospective observational before-and-after study of 40 patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an established cannulation program by cardiothoracic surgeons versus a rapidly deployed medical intensivist cannulation program. SETTING: An adult ICU in a tertiary academic medical center in Camden, NJ. PATIENTS: Critically ill adult subjects with severe respiratory failure undergoing percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation performed by cardiothoracic surgeons compared with cannulations performed by medical intensivists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation site attempts were retrospectively reviewed. Subject demographics, specialty of physician performing cannulation, type of support, cannulation configuration, cannula size, imaging guidance, success rate, and complications were recorded and summarized. Twenty-two cannulations were performed by three cardiothoracic surgeons in 11 subjects between September 2019 and February 2020. The cannulation program rapidly transitioned to an intensivist-led and performed program in March 2020. Fifty-seven cannulations were performed by eight intensivists in 29 subjects between March 2020 and December 2020. Mean body mass index for subjects did not differ between groups (33.86 vs 35.89; p = 0.775). There was no difference in days on mechanical ventilation prior to cannulation, configuration, cannula size, or discharge condition. There was no difference in success rate of cannulation on first attempt per cannulation site (95.5 vs 96.7; p = 0.483) or major complication rate per cannulation site (4.5 vs 3.5; p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between success and complication rates of percutaneous venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation canulation when performed by cardiothoracic surgeons versus medical intensivist in an already established extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. A rapidly deployed cannulation program by intensivists for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be performed with high success and low complication rates.

National Resident Matching Program Rank Order and Performance in an Internal Medicine Residency.

OBJECTIVES: Prospective first-year house staff and residency program leaders spend substantial time, effort, and expense preparing a rank order list for the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Previous studies have mostly shown minimal or no relation between rank order and subsequent resident performance, raising questions about the value of this process. Furthermore, no previous studies have been done with Internal Medicine residencies. As such, the purpose of this study was to compare NRMP rank order to multiple objective outcomes of an Internal Medicine residency. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of Internal Medicine residents from five consecutive graduating classes, trained between July 1, 2013 and July 31, 2020, were evaluated for five objective outcomes: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones, faculty rankings of quality, National In-Training Examination scores, chief resident attainment, and fellowship attainment. Outcomes were analyzed in relation to eight potential predictors: NRMP rank, medical school type and grades, immigration status, added qualifications, sex, age and US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: From a cohort of 61 residents, 56 were eligible. All eligible residents' data were included, for a participation rate of 100% (56 of 56). There were no statistically significant univariate or multivariate predictors for the endpoint of fellowship attainment. Higher USMLE scores were predictive of chief resident status in univariate analysis only. NRMP rank was significantly correlated with ACGME milestones in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed that higher USMLE score was statistically significantly predictive of more favorable milestones, faculty ranking, and National In-Training Examination score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher USMLE score was statistically significantly associated with multiple favorable objective residency outcomes in an Internal Medicine residency. A better NRMP rank was correlated with favorable ACGME milestones in univariate analysis, but USMLE score emerged as the strongest predictor in multivariate analysis.

Telemetry Overuse and the Effect of Educational and Electronic Health Record-Based Interventions on an Academic Internal Medicine Ward.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for appropriate use of telemetry recommend monitoring for specific patient populations; however, many hospitalized patients receive telemetry monitoring without an indication. Clinical data and outcomes associated with nonindicated monitoring are not well studied. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the impact of an education and an order entry intervention on telemetry overuse and to identify the diagnoses and telemetry-related outcomes of patients who receive telemetry monitoring without guidelines indication. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients on internal medicine (IM) wards between 2015 and 2018 examining the effects of educational and order entry interventions at an academic urban medical center. A baseline cohort examining telemetry use was established. This was followed by the delivery of IM resident educational sessions regarding telemetry guidelines. In a subsequent intervention, the telemetry order entry system was modified with a constraint to require American Heart Association guidelines justification. RESULTS: Across all of the cohorts, 51% (n = 141) of patients lacked a guidelines-specified indication. These patients had variable diagnoses. The educational intervention alone did not result in significant differences in telemetry use by IM residents. The order entry intervention resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of guidelines-indicated patients and a decrease in nonindicated patients on telemetry. No safety events were noted in any group. CONCLUSIONS: A telemetry order entry system modification implemented following an educational intervention is more likely to reduce telemetry use than an educational intervention alone in IM resident practice. A variety of patients are monitored without evidence of need; therefore, the clinical impact of telemetry reduction is unlikely to be harmful.

How did COVID-19 affect medical and cardiology journals? A pandemic in literature.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The spreading speed of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the medical community to produce efforts in updating and sharing the evidence about this new disease, trying to preserve the accuracy of the data but at the same time avoiding the potentially harmful delay from discovery to implementation. The aim of our analysis was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical literature in terms of proportion of COVID-19-related published papers and temporal patterns of publications within a sample of general/internal medicine and cardiology journals. METHODS: We searched through PubMed scientific papers published from 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2021 about COVID-19 in ten major medical journals, of which five were in general/internal medicine and five in the cardiology field. We analyzed the proportion of COVID-19-related papers, and we examined temporal trends in the number of published papers. RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of COVID-19-related papers was 18.5% (1986/10 756). This proportion was higher among the five selected general/internal medicine journals, compared with cardiology journals (23.8% vs 9.5%). The vast majority of papers were not original articles; in particular, in cardiology journals, there were 28% 'original articles', 17% 'review articles' and 55.1% 'miscellaneous', compared with 20.2%, 5.1% and 74.7% in general/internal medicine journals, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis highlights the big impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international scientific literature. General and internal medicine journals were mainly involved, with cardiology journals only at a later time.

Risk factors associated with unintentional medication discrepancies at admission in an internal medicine department.

At admission, unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs) can occur and may led to severe adverse events. Some of them are preventable through medication reconciliation (MR). As MR is a time-consuming activity, a better identification of high-risk patients of UMDs is mandatory. The objective was to identify risk factors associated with UMDs at admission in an internal medicine department. This prospective observational study was conducted from April 2017 to June 2019. At admission, inpatients had MR to obtain a complete list of home medications. This list was compared to prescriptions made at admission. All discrepancies were classified as intentional or UMDs. Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors associated with UMDs were performed. MR was performed on 1157 patients (70.1 ± 16.8 years old); 550 MR (47.5%) contained at least one UMD. More than half of the UMDs (n = 892, 65.6%) corresponded to drug omission. The univariate analysis showed that age (> 60 years old), "living at home", medication preparation not performed by patient, medication-intake difficulties, number of sources consulted, MR duration, presence of a high-risk drug and the number of home medications were associated with UMDs. In the multivariate analysis, adjusted on the number of sources consulted, independent risk factors were "living at home" and the number of home medications. At admission to an internal medicine department, UMDs were frequent and associated with "living at home" and poly-medication. Our findings might help physicians to identify high-risk patients of UMDs since their admission.

La pluripatologia en una Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardíaca: la perspectiva de un internista / Pluripathology in a Heart Failure Unit - a internist’ perspective

Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de pluripatología en una Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardíaca, definir las características de los pacientes pluripatológicos y su pronóstico vital según dos modelos: el índice PROFUND y el Seattle Heart Failure Model. Material y métodos: Se han analizado de forma consecutiva los pacientes observados en la consulta de insuficiencia cardíaca de un hospital de tercer nivel durante dos meses. Se han registrado comorbilidades, categorías de pluripatología y los índices de Charlson, Barthel, Seattle Heart Failure Model y PROFUND. Resultados: Se incluyeron 246 pacientes, de los que 118 (48%) fueron pluripatológicos, con índice de Charlson 7,9±3,8 y PROFUND 3,5±7,1.La categoría de pluripatología más prevalente fue la A, seguida de la B yC. Los pluripatológicos fueron mayores (77 vs. 73 años, p=0,001), más frágiles, con mayor limitación funcional (Barthel: 84,7 vs. 96,1, p<0,001),mayor prevalencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y enfermedades crónicas e ingresaron más (14,4 vs. 4,7, p=0,015). La etiología más frecuente fue la cardiopatía isquémica. Los pacientes pluripatológicos tenían clase funcional más avanzada NHYA III-IV (4,2 vs. 0,8, p<0,001), NT-proBNP más elevados (2985 pg/ml vs. 1780 pg/ml, p=0,013) y precisaron mayor dosis de diuréticos (60 vs 40, p<0,001). Se verificó una concordancia en la estimativa de mortalidad entre el PROFUND y el Seattle Heart Failure Model. Conclusiones: Este estudio demuestra la elevada frecuencia de pacientes pluripatológicos en una unidad de insuficiencia cardíaca, reflejando una mayor sobrecarga asistencial y necesidad de cuidados más complejos. Se trata de una población con gran fragilidad, dependencia funcional y comorbilidad, que obliga a plantear un abordaje multidisciplinar. (AU)

Objectives: to determine the frequency of pluripathology in a Heart Failure Unit, defining the characteristics of pluripathological patients and their vital prognosis according to two models: PROFUND score and Seattle Heart Failure Model. Methods: consecutive patients from a Heart Failure Unit of a third level hospital were analized during two months. Comorbidities, pluripathology categories and Charlson, Barthel, Seattle Heart Failure Model and PROFUND scores were registered. Results: 246 patients were included, of which 118 (48%) were pluripathological, with Charlson score 7.9 ± 3.8 and PROFUND 3.5 ± 7.1.The most prevalent category of pluripathology was A, followed by B and C. The pluripathological patients were older (77 vs. 73 years, p = 0.001),more fragile, with greater functional limitation (Barthel: 84.7 vs. 96, 1,p <0.001), higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and chronic diseases and admitted more (14.4 vs. 4.7, p = 0.015). The most frequent etiology was ischemic heart disease. The pluripathological patients hadmore advanced functional class NHYA III-IV (4.2 vs. 0.8, p <0.001), higherNT-proBNP (2985 pg/ml vs. 1780 pg/ml, p = 0.013) and required higherdose of diuretics (60 vs 40, p <0.001). A concordance in the mortality estimate between the PROFUND and the Seattle Heart Failure Model wasverified. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the high frequency of pluripathological patients in a heart failure unit, population with great fragility, due to functional dependence and the association of comorbidities, that requires a multidisciplinary approach. (AU)

Association of diabetes with frequency and cost of hospital admissions: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute inpatient hospital admissions account for more than half of all health care costs related to diabetes. We sought to identify the most common and costly conditions leading to hospital admission among patients with diabetes compared with patients without diabetes. METHODS: We used data from the General Internal Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) study, a retrospective cohort study, of all patients admitted to a general internal medicine service at 7 Toronto hospitals between 2010 and 2015. The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Most Responsible Diagnosis code was used to identify the 10 most frequent reasons for admission in patients with diabetes. Cost of hospital admission was estimated using the CIHI Resource Intensity Weight. Comparisons were made between patients with or without diabetes using the Pearson χ2 test for frequency and distribution-free confidence intervals (CIs) for median cost. RESULTS: Among the 150 499 hospital admissions in our study, 41 934 (27.8%) involved patients with diabetes. Compared with patients without diabetes, hospital admissions because of soft tissue and bone infections were most frequent (2.5% v. 1.9%; prevalence ratio [PR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.19-1.37) and costly (Can$8794 v. Can$5845; cost ratio [CR] 1.50, 95% CI 1.37-1.65) among patients with diabetes. This was followed by urinary tract infections (PR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.22; CR 1.23, 95% CI 1.17-1.29), stroke (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19; CR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.25) and electrolyte disorders (PR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20; CR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.34). INTERPRETATION: Soft tissue and bone infections, urinary tract infections, stroke and electrolyte disorders are associated with a greater frequency and cost of hospital admissions in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Preventive strategies focused on reducing hospital admissions secondary to these disorders may be beneficial in patients with diabetes.

Screening for atrial fibrillation during automated blood pressure measurement among patients admitted to internal medicine ward.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting the adult population, is often casually discovered among hospitalized people. AF onset is indeed triggered by several clinical conditions such as acute inflammatory states, infections, and electrolyte disturbance, frequently occurring during the hospitalization. We aimed to evaluate whether systematic AF screening, performed through an automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) device (Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, Microlife AG, Switzerland), is effective for detecting AF episodes in subjects admitted to an Internal Medicine ward. 163 patients consecutively hospitalized at the Unit of Internal Medicine of the "Santa Maria" Terni University Hospital between November 2019 and January 2020 (mean age ± standard deviation: 77 ± 14 years, men proportion: 40%) were examined. Simultaneously with BP measurement and AF screening, a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed in all subjects. AF was diagnosed by ECG in 29 patients (18%). AF screening showed overall 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity. False negatives (n = 4) had RR-interval coefficient of variation lower than true positives (n = 25, p < 0.01), suggesting a regular ventricular rhythm during AF. The repeated evaluation substantially confirmed the same level of agreement. AF screening was positive in all patients with new-onset AF (n = 6, 100%). Systematic AF screening in patients admitted to Internal Medicine wards, performed using the Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, is feasible and effective. The opportunity to implement such technology in daily routine clinical practice to prevent undiagnosed AF episodes in hospitalized patients should be the subject of further research.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis: management advice for internal medicine and emergency physicians.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis is a medical emergency that warrants in-patient management. This is best served within a multidisciplinary team setting in specialised centres or with expert consultation. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone in the management of ASUC and should be initiated promptly, along with general management measures and close monitoring of patients. Unfortunately, one-third of patients will fail to respond to steroids. Response to intravenous corticosteroid therapy needs to be assessed on the third day and rescue therapies, including cyclosporine and infliximab, should be offered to patients not responding. Choice of rescue therapy depends on experience, drug availability and factors associated with each individual patient, such as comorbidities, previous medications or contra-indications to therapy. Patients who have not responded within 7 days to rescue therapy must be considered for surgery. Surgery is a treatment option in ASUC and should not be delayed in cases of failure of medical therapy, because such delays increase surgical morbidity and mortality. This review summarises the current management of acute severe ulcerative colitis and discusses potential future developments.

Implementation of an academic hospital medicine procedure service: 5-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: Procedural complications are a common source of adverse events in hospitals, especially where bedside procedures are often performed by trainees. Medical procedure services (MPS) have been established to improve procedural education, ensure patient safety, and provide additional revenue for services that are typically referred. Prior descriptions of MPS have reported outcomes over one to 2 years. We aim to describe the implementation and 5-year outcomes of a hospitalist-run MPS. METHODS: We identified all patients referred to our MPS for a procedure over the 5-year span between 2014 and 2018. We manually reviewed all charts for complications of paracentesis, thoracentesis, central venous catheterization, and lumbar punctures performed by the MPS in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Annual charges for these procedures were queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. RESULTS: We identified 3,634 MPS procedures. Of these, ultrasound guidance was used in 3224 (88.7%) and trainees performed 2701 (74%). Complications identified included pneumothorax (3.7%, n = 16) for thoracentesis, post-dural puncture headache (13.9%, n = 100) and bleeding (0.1%, n = 1) for lumbar puncture, ascites leak for diagnostic (1.6%, n = 8) and large volume (3.7%, n = 56) paracentesis, and bleeding (3.5%, n = 16) for central venous catheter placement. Prior to initiation of the MPS, total annual procedural charges were $90,437. After MPS implementation, charges increased to a mean of $787,352 annually in the last 4 years of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a hospitalist-run, academic MPS resulted in a large volume of procedures, high rate of trainee participation, low rates of complications, and significant increase in procedural charges over 5 years. Wider adoption of this model has the potential to further improve patient procedural care and trainee education.

Contemporary Management of Pancreatic Cancer from an Internist Perspective.

Primary care physicians are in a favorable position to curb the growing burden of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review aims to provide an overview of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from a primary care perspective, with a specific focus on risk factors, selection of high-risk individuals for screening, patient presentation at the primary-care clinic, and the role of the internist in supportive care. Overall, the internist is an essential member of the multidisciplinary care team with respect to optimizing patients' quality of life across various stages of the pancreatic cancer.